| FLY ON THE WALL |
Awwwww...look
at that smile!
That father
Murphy was
such a good boy!
at that smile!
That father
Murphy was
such a good boy!
Father Murphy (center) accepts a check for $16,000 on
behalf of St. Johns School for the Deaf from the Knights
of Columbus in 1966. Murphy, who was fluent in American
Sign Language, was a tireless fund-raiser for St. Johns,
where he worked from 1950 to 1974. By all accounts,
Murphy was much revered in the deaf community.
behalf of St. Johns School for the Deaf from the Knights
of Columbus in 1966. Murphy, who was fluent in American
Sign Language, was a tireless fund-raiser for St. Johns,
where he worked from 1950 to 1974. By all accounts,
Murphy was much revered in the deaf community.
How strong is your faith? Do
you believe what's in the bible?
....test yourself. Let your child
spend a few nights with your
priest.........nothing will happen.
....or you can choose to stay
home on Sunday and spend
some quality time with them...the
park, movies, zoo or counting fat
people at Wal Mart.
you believe what's in the bible?
....test yourself. Let your child
spend a few nights with your
priest.........nothing will happen.
....or you can choose to stay
home on Sunday and spend
some quality time with them...the
park, movies, zoo or counting fat
people at Wal Mart.
Rev Lawrence Murphy’s paedophilia ‘as widely known, but ignored’
The emotional scars remain years later for victims of Father Lawrence Murphy, a priest who molested generations of youngsters in the US
Midwest state of Wisconsin. Donald Marshall, who was abused by Murphy when he was a teenager at a juvenile detention centre, said: “I haven’
t stepped in a church for some 20 years. I lost all faith in the Church.”
Arthur Budzinski was abused at a school for the deaf in the city of St Francis, in the Milwaukee Diocese. Murphy taught at the school from 1950
to 1974, and even became director , despite the allegations.
Mr Budzinski said the priest would come to their dormitory at night and molest the deaf pupils. He was first molested by Murphy when he was 12,
and was deceived by his “friendliness”. “If he was a real mean guy, I would have stayed away,” said Mr Budzinski, using sign language
interpreted by his daughter. “But he was so friendly, and so nice ... I knew he was wrong, but I couldn’t really believe it.” One of the lawyers
involved in the case said: “Instead of removing him from the priesthood, they just gave him a free pass.”
Documents show that the Archbishop of Milwaukee then, the Most Rev Rembert Weakland, warned Cardinal Tarciscio Bertone that Murphy had
“no sense of remorse” and did not seem to realise the gravity of what he had done. He told the cardinal that three psychologists had concluded
that Murphy was a “typical” paedophile who saw himself as “a victim”.
Pope 'failed to act' on sex abuse claims
In the documents, the victims describe how Murphy “touched” them in his office, in his car, his mother’s house, on class excursions, on
fundraising trips and in their dormitory beds at night.
Three successive bishops of Milwaukee were told that Murphy was abusing children. Yet he was quietly moved to the Diocese of Superior in
northern Wisconsin in 1974, where he remained active in parishes, schools and the juvenile detention centre, where Mr Marshall lost his faith.
Murphy died in 1998 of natural causes.
The emotional scars remain years later for victims of Father Lawrence Murphy, a priest who molested generations of youngsters in the US
Midwest state of Wisconsin. Donald Marshall, who was abused by Murphy when he was a teenager at a juvenile detention centre, said: “I haven’
t stepped in a church for some 20 years. I lost all faith in the Church.”
Arthur Budzinski was abused at a school for the deaf in the city of St Francis, in the Milwaukee Diocese. Murphy taught at the school from 1950
to 1974, and even became director , despite the allegations.
Mr Budzinski said the priest would come to their dormitory at night and molest the deaf pupils. He was first molested by Murphy when he was 12,
and was deceived by his “friendliness”. “If he was a real mean guy, I would have stayed away,” said Mr Budzinski, using sign language
interpreted by his daughter. “But he was so friendly, and so nice ... I knew he was wrong, but I couldn’t really believe it.” One of the lawyers
involved in the case said: “Instead of removing him from the priesthood, they just gave him a free pass.”
Documents show that the Archbishop of Milwaukee then, the Most Rev Rembert Weakland, warned Cardinal Tarciscio Bertone that Murphy had
“no sense of remorse” and did not seem to realise the gravity of what he had done. He told the cardinal that three psychologists had concluded
that Murphy was a “typical” paedophile who saw himself as “a victim”.
Pope 'failed to act' on sex abuse claims
In the documents, the victims describe how Murphy “touched” them in his office, in his car, his mother’s house, on class excursions, on
fundraising trips and in their dormitory beds at night.
Three successive bishops of Milwaukee were told that Murphy was abusing children. Yet he was quietly moved to the Diocese of Superior in
northern Wisconsin in 1974, where he remained active in parishes, schools and the juvenile detention centre, where Mr Marshall lost his faith.
Murphy died in 1998 of natural causes.
| RULEBOOK & BIBLE 101 WARNING: some of the "words" printed in these books can be changed and interpreted differently at anytime without notice. Please read with caution & whiteout. and toiletpaper shit might be flying your way. |
Ever confront someone with a QUESTION and their body language goes from "confident" to "defensive"? Most of the time people answer questions
before A word leaves their mouth.
I recently started reading the bible (about 2 months ago). I've read it off and on throughout the years but recently I stuck my nose in it and really
started trying to "be it". Just like any other book it's best to stick your nose in it for hours at a time and start to imagine and become part of the
story. Helps you understand a little better. Along the way I've had questions. So I've asked. Every person I've asked gave me the same answer.
They tried to explain to me that what was THERE in black and white, wasn't really THERE. Another words, what is printed in this book in plain black
& white doesn't really mean what it says. That these words sitting in front of me mean something else. Kinda confusing right? No........these are just
humans at their best. Thanks to the dialog I've had with these people in the last couple of months I was prepared for this weekend.
Few questions in Kingsville were raised concerning our RULEBOOK (The bible of USA BOXING. Which, doesn't stand for much nowdays). One was
concerning rule
101.7 (a)
(2) Open Division - minimum age, 17: maximum age, 34 (up to day boxers turns 35 years of age)
(a) Should a situation occur requiring qualifying events for US Championships, Pan American Games or Olympic Games to be conducted in the
calendar year prior to the vent, USA Boxing's Board of Directors shall have the authority to establish age criteria in compliance with international
AIBA rules. Under no circumstances will a 16-year-old boxer compete in the Junior Olympic Tournament process once the athlete has
completed in a open class qualfying event.
(3) Under Nineteen/Junior Mens Division-ages 17-18
(4) Masters Division
This rule below 101.7(e) is in bold too. The rule book, has it in BOLD. Yes, that's right BOLD LETTERS. Like it mattered at one point or another.
Rule 101.7 (e)
RESTRICTION. Junior Olympic boxers may not enter or compete in any open class (age 17 & up) boxing tournament, championship, or boxing
contest as mentioned in 101.7(2)(a). If they do compete, the boxers is no longer eligible to compete as a Junior Olympic boxer.
Now after reading the "passage" above it would be safe to say that a boxer who has competed in the Under - 19 tournament can longer participate
in the Junior Olympic tournament. Umm........wrong. They can. Why you ask? Cause they said so. . . . and that's how the ball rolls.
I called USA BOXING today (4-20-10) to ask about changes to our rulebook. They said all changes have been posted to the website (changes).
The current rule book available for download is the most recent and the one we should follow. When asked about the rule change that occurred
this weekend I was put on hold then transferred. Uh huh...tranfered.... to a machine. . . "please leave a message". Yeah, I left a message..........
"God hates homos & foreskin".
When I confronted "GOD" about the violation of rules according to our "bible" he stated that there had been an error at the Under 19 tournament
and the boxer who had advanced to the finals against one of my boxers was allowed to participate in this SR tournament. Cause of this error he
was allowed to compete in our local JO Tournament. While he was telling me this I was repeating the words, "Don't kill the messenger" in my mind
over and over. This allowed me to "smile" at the situation and find some humor in it. Well, there was NEVER any error as stated by our USA Boxing
Executive Director, Michael Martini. He simply decided to change the rule. END OF STORY. Below is a copy of his response on the DAY OF
COMPETITION.
Mark,
The National Office reviewed the circumstances relating to several Junior Olympic age boxers who were allowed to register and compete in Under
19 Tournament and have determined it in the best interest of those boxer and the organization to allow them to remain in the Junior Olympic level,
until they turn the age of an Open Class Boxer. The athletes' right to compete outweighs the decision to not allow them to compete and basically,
be in Limbo, no place to compete.
Michael Martini
Interim Executive Director
USA Boxing
Michael, they're not in limbo. They made a decision to compete in the Under 19 tournament therefore they are not eligible to compete in our JO
program.
The fact that the change was made is not a big deal. All the boxers who competed at the Under 19 tournament that entered our JO tournament
didn't advance to state. So the actual fact that this rule was/will/has been changed doesn't mean much. The way it was changed DOES mean
something. Anytime a coach questions an official they are fast to point to our rulebook. The ONE time a coach decides to point towards the
rulebook to correct an error by an official, he's denied. A nail is much easier to swallow when it's shot straight down your throat. Shoot straight.
before A word leaves their mouth.
I recently started reading the bible (about 2 months ago). I've read it off and on throughout the years but recently I stuck my nose in it and really
started trying to "be it". Just like any other book it's best to stick your nose in it for hours at a time and start to imagine and become part of the
story. Helps you understand a little better. Along the way I've had questions. So I've asked. Every person I've asked gave me the same answer.
They tried to explain to me that what was THERE in black and white, wasn't really THERE. Another words, what is printed in this book in plain black
& white doesn't really mean what it says. That these words sitting in front of me mean something else. Kinda confusing right? No........these are just
humans at their best. Thanks to the dialog I've had with these people in the last couple of months I was prepared for this weekend.
Few questions in Kingsville were raised concerning our RULEBOOK (The bible of USA BOXING. Which, doesn't stand for much nowdays). One was
concerning rule
101.7 (a)
(2) Open Division - minimum age, 17: maximum age, 34 (up to day boxers turns 35 years of age)
(a) Should a situation occur requiring qualifying events for US Championships, Pan American Games or Olympic Games to be conducted in the
calendar year prior to the vent, USA Boxing's Board of Directors shall have the authority to establish age criteria in compliance with international
AIBA rules. Under no circumstances will a 16-year-old boxer compete in the Junior Olympic Tournament process once the athlete has
completed in a open class qualfying event.
(3) Under Nineteen/Junior Mens Division-ages 17-18
(4) Masters Division
This rule below 101.7(e) is in bold too. The rule book, has it in BOLD. Yes, that's right BOLD LETTERS. Like it mattered at one point or another.
Rule 101.7 (e)
RESTRICTION. Junior Olympic boxers may not enter or compete in any open class (age 17 & up) boxing tournament, championship, or boxing
contest as mentioned in 101.7(2)(a). If they do compete, the boxers is no longer eligible to compete as a Junior Olympic boxer.
Now after reading the "passage" above it would be safe to say that a boxer who has competed in the Under - 19 tournament can longer participate
in the Junior Olympic tournament. Umm........wrong. They can. Why you ask? Cause they said so. . . . and that's how the ball rolls.
I called USA BOXING today (4-20-10) to ask about changes to our rulebook. They said all changes have been posted to the website (changes).
The current rule book available for download is the most recent and the one we should follow. When asked about the rule change that occurred
this weekend I was put on hold then transferred. Uh huh...tranfered.... to a machine. . . "please leave a message". Yeah, I left a message..........
"God hates homos & foreskin".
When I confronted "GOD" about the violation of rules according to our "bible" he stated that there had been an error at the Under 19 tournament
and the boxer who had advanced to the finals against one of my boxers was allowed to participate in this SR tournament. Cause of this error he
was allowed to compete in our local JO Tournament. While he was telling me this I was repeating the words, "Don't kill the messenger" in my mind
over and over. This allowed me to "smile" at the situation and find some humor in it. Well, there was NEVER any error as stated by our USA Boxing
Executive Director, Michael Martini. He simply decided to change the rule. END OF STORY. Below is a copy of his response on the DAY OF
COMPETITION.
Mark,
The National Office reviewed the circumstances relating to several Junior Olympic age boxers who were allowed to register and compete in Under
19 Tournament and have determined it in the best interest of those boxer and the organization to allow them to remain in the Junior Olympic level,
until they turn the age of an Open Class Boxer. The athletes' right to compete outweighs the decision to not allow them to compete and basically,
be in Limbo, no place to compete.
Michael Martini
Interim Executive Director
USA Boxing
Michael, they're not in limbo. They made a decision to compete in the Under 19 tournament therefore they are not eligible to compete in our JO
program.
The fact that the change was made is not a big deal. All the boxers who competed at the Under 19 tournament that entered our JO tournament
didn't advance to state. So the actual fact that this rule was/will/has been changed doesn't mean much. The way it was changed DOES mean
something. Anytime a coach questions an official they are fast to point to our rulebook. The ONE time a coach decides to point towards the
rulebook to correct an error by an official, he's denied. A nail is much easier to swallow when it's shot straight down your throat. Shoot straight.
| Copy of the email sent by Michael Martini USA Boxing Interim Executive Director. (with a small touch of spaghetti sauce. Used to validate it's authenticity) |
PHOENIX – Arodi Berrelleza isn't one of the targets of Arizona's new law cracking down on illegal immigration — he's a U.S. citizen, a high school
student from Phoenix.
But the 18-year-old said he's afraid he'll be arrested anyway if police see him driving around with friends and relatives, some of them illegal
immigrants.
"If a cop sees them and they look Mexican, he's going to stop me," Berrelleza said. "What if people are U.S. citizens? They're going to be asking
them if they have papers because of the color of their skin."
Berrelleza's concerns were echoed by Hispanics across the state Saturday, a day after Gov. Jan Brewer signed a bill that requires police to
question people about their immigration status — including asking for identification — if they suspect someone is in the country illegally.
The new law, which will take effect in late July or early August, was cheered by many, including Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose tough
crackdowns have made him a hero in the anti-illegal immigration community. He said it gives him new authority to detain undocumented migrants
who aren't accused of committing any other crimes.
.
Get the scoop:Click here to stay up to date with Yahoo! News on Facebook
..Hispanics fear profiling under new Arizona law
Buzz up!1373 votes Send
Email IM .Share
Facebook Twitter Delicious Digg Fark Newsvine Reddit StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Bookmarks .Print .. AFP/Getty Images/File –
Demonstrators protest Arizona's new immigration law outside the Arizona state capitol building on …
. Slideshow:Immigration Reform Debate .
Play Video Video:Terry Moran on Arizona Immigration Battle ABC News .
Play Video Video:AZ Governor Signs Immigration Bill ABC News .
By JONATHAN J. COOPER, Associated Press Writers Jonathan J. Cooper, Associated Press Writers – Sat Apr 24, 7:36 pm ET
PHOENIX – Arodi Berrelleza isn't one of the targets of Arizona's new law cracking down on illegal immigration — he's a U.S. citizen, a high school
student from Phoenix.
But the 18-year-old said he's afraid he'll be arrested anyway if police see him driving around with friends and relatives, some of them illegal
immigrants.
"If a cop sees them and they look Mexican, he's going to stop me," Berrelleza said. "What if people are U.S. citizens? They're going to be asking
them if they have papers because of the color of their skin."
Berrelleza's concerns were echoed by Hispanics across the state Saturday, a day after Gov. Jan Brewer signed a bill that requires police to
question people about their immigration status — including asking for identification — if they suspect someone is in the country illegally.
The new law, which will take effect in late July or early August, was cheered by many, including Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose tough
crackdowns have made him a hero in the anti-illegal immigration community. He said it gives him new authority to detain undocumented migrants
who aren't accused of committing any other crimes.
"Now if we show they're illegal, we can actually arrest them and put them in our jails," Arpaio said.
Current law in Arizona and most states doesn't require police to ask about the immigration status of those they come across, and many
departments prohibit officers from inquiring out of fear immigrants won't report crime or cooperate in other investigations.
Now, police departments seen as weak on illegal immigration could face lawsuits. The new measure also toughens restrictions on hiring illegal
immigrants for day labor and knowingly transporting them.
Arizona has an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants and is the state with the most illegal border crossings, with the harsh, remote desert serving
as the gateway for thousands of Mexicans and Central Americans.
Arpaio said he hoped Arizona's example coerces the federal government into acting to seal the border. President Barack Obama called the new
law "misguided" Friday and instructed the Justice Department to examine it to see if it's legal, but also allowed that the failure to enact
immigration reform at the national level
left the door open to "irresponsibility by others."
student from Phoenix.
But the 18-year-old said he's afraid he'll be arrested anyway if police see him driving around with friends and relatives, some of them illegal
immigrants.
"If a cop sees them and they look Mexican, he's going to stop me," Berrelleza said. "What if people are U.S. citizens? They're going to be asking
them if they have papers because of the color of their skin."
Berrelleza's concerns were echoed by Hispanics across the state Saturday, a day after Gov. Jan Brewer signed a bill that requires police to
question people about their immigration status — including asking for identification — if they suspect someone is in the country illegally.
The new law, which will take effect in late July or early August, was cheered by many, including Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose tough
crackdowns have made him a hero in the anti-illegal immigration community. He said it gives him new authority to detain undocumented migrants
who aren't accused of committing any other crimes.
.
Get the scoop:Click here to stay up to date with Yahoo! News on Facebook
..Hispanics fear profiling under new Arizona law
Buzz up!1373 votes Send
Email IM .Share
Facebook Twitter Delicious Digg Fark Newsvine Reddit StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Bookmarks .Print .. AFP/Getty Images/File –
Demonstrators protest Arizona's new immigration law outside the Arizona state capitol building on …
. Slideshow:Immigration Reform Debate .
Play Video Video:Terry Moran on Arizona Immigration Battle ABC News .
Play Video Video:AZ Governor Signs Immigration Bill ABC News .
By JONATHAN J. COOPER, Associated Press Writers Jonathan J. Cooper, Associated Press Writers – Sat Apr 24, 7:36 pm ET
PHOENIX – Arodi Berrelleza isn't one of the targets of Arizona's new law cracking down on illegal immigration — he's a U.S. citizen, a high school
student from Phoenix.
But the 18-year-old said he's afraid he'll be arrested anyway if police see him driving around with friends and relatives, some of them illegal
immigrants.
"If a cop sees them and they look Mexican, he's going to stop me," Berrelleza said. "What if people are U.S. citizens? They're going to be asking
them if they have papers because of the color of their skin."
Berrelleza's concerns were echoed by Hispanics across the state Saturday, a day after Gov. Jan Brewer signed a bill that requires police to
question people about their immigration status — including asking for identification — if they suspect someone is in the country illegally.
The new law, which will take effect in late July or early August, was cheered by many, including Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose tough
crackdowns have made him a hero in the anti-illegal immigration community. He said it gives him new authority to detain undocumented migrants
who aren't accused of committing any other crimes.
"Now if we show they're illegal, we can actually arrest them and put them in our jails," Arpaio said.
Current law in Arizona and most states doesn't require police to ask about the immigration status of those they come across, and many
departments prohibit officers from inquiring out of fear immigrants won't report crime or cooperate in other investigations.
Now, police departments seen as weak on illegal immigration could face lawsuits. The new measure also toughens restrictions on hiring illegal
immigrants for day labor and knowingly transporting them.
Arizona has an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants and is the state with the most illegal border crossings, with the harsh, remote desert serving
as the gateway for thousands of Mexicans and Central Americans.
Arpaio said he hoped Arizona's example coerces the federal government into acting to seal the border. President Barack Obama called the new
law "misguided" Friday and instructed the Justice Department to examine it to see if it's legal, but also allowed that the failure to enact
immigration reform at the national level
left the door open to "irresponsibility by others."
Let's level the playing field. If Arizona wants to randomly
ask MEXICANS for prove they are from the US ..
Mexicans should have the right to ask any balding white
man with low top white tennis if he's a pedophile and black
men with baggy jeans what gang they belong
to............idiots.
ask MEXICANS for prove they are from the US ..
Mexicans should have the right to ask any balding white
man with low top white tennis if he's a pedophile and black
men with baggy jeans what gang they belong
to............idiots.
EMAIL SENT TO RAMOS BOXINGTEAM
Hi there,
I just moved to San Antonio, and I was wanting to get up with a decent boxing club. I've been training for about three years now. However, I
went onto your website's main page, and I saw your little anti-US military video. Are you just against the war? Or are you anti-military in
general? I am just curious why you place it on your site's main page, when it has nothing to do with boxing, or sports. My last question is since
I am in the military, should I even bother coming in to look at the place, or would it behoove me to look for a different place to train? Thanks
Hi there,
I just moved to San Antonio, and I was wanting to get up with a decent boxing club. I've been training for about three years now. However, I
went onto your website's main page, and I saw your little anti-US military video. Are you just against the war? Or are you anti-military in
general? I am just curious why you place it on your site's main page, when it has nothing to do with boxing, or sports. My last question is since
I am in the military, should I even bother coming in to look at the place, or would it behoove me to look for a different place to train? Thanks
RESPONSE FROM Arturo Ramos III
I guess you didn't see the video. My brother is in the USAF. Had an uncle (by marriage) who spent 30 years in the Army. Few of the boxers here
have military backgrounds. The video has nothing to do with being anti-military it has to do with knowing the truth. I personally am pretty blunt
and straight forward. If you've been training for 3 years and you come here and I see that it looks like you haven't, I'll let you know. If you're
training for a fight with our club and I feel you're not ready, you will not fight. Simple. Truth.
I guess you didn't see the video. My brother is in the USAF. Had an uncle (by marriage) who spent 30 years in the Army. Few of the boxers here
have military backgrounds. The video has nothing to do with being anti-military it has to do with knowing the truth. I personally am pretty blunt
and straight forward. If you've been training for 3 years and you come here and I see that it looks like you haven't, I'll let you know. If you're
training for a fight with our club and I feel you're not ready, you will not fight. Simple. Truth.
| I've posted this to answer any questions/thoughts that people might think I'm anti-war. Ummm...No, I love violence.I'm just anti-lie. New term. Use it Monkey. |
This is what's wrong with the place we
call the world. People are afraid to
speak against the Truth for fear of
what they will be seen as by our
Society. It's shit. There's only one way
things work, the TRUTH. if there's hard
proof that American soliders are
causing malice shut your trap, put on
your helmet and deal with it. It's right in
front of your eyes. Don't turn away.
Facts are Facts, Truth is Truth.
NOW Gimme some chon chon!
call the world. People are afraid to
speak against the Truth for fear of
what they will be seen as by our
Society. It's shit. There's only one way
things work, the TRUTH. if there's hard
proof that American soliders are
causing malice shut your trap, put on
your helmet and deal with it. It's right in
front of your eyes. Don't turn away.
Facts are Facts, Truth is Truth.
NOW Gimme some chon chon!